In terms of a historical perspective in relation to the soundtrack of the Shawshank Redemption, it tends to fall under the category of coming from the classical period of soundtrack history. In particular, it is the soundtracks reliance on voiceover narration and music in the sound design that really links it to the classical period. Movie soundtracks first came into public consciousness in the early 1950’s, being labelled and advertised as “music from the original motion picture”. Like these early soundtracks, the Shawshank Redemption accurately fit’s the profile, because it consists of the certain isolated pieces of music from the film, and it includes background music, such as, frequently used orchestrated themes and motifs throughout the movie. Not only does the aspects of the music in the film contribute to the classical period, but so to does the actual music itself, coming from the 1930‘s to 1950‘s. The soundtrack includes music from the country, folk, classical, and rhythm and blues genres, which are all considered to be apart of the founding roots of music. The majority of the soundtrack is made up of songs by Hank Williams, The Ink Spots, and orchestrated compositions by Thomas Newman himself, making for an original and authentic musical experience. The sound design for the movie can be considered relatively restrained, compared to the stories sentimentality, but that’s what seems to make it so successful, the crisp dialogue throughout makes up for any subtlety, and appears to be the projected focus.
Archive for the ‘Shawshank Redemption Analysis’ Category
The Shawshank Redemption: Historical context
April 16, 2010
Functional Analysis: The Shawshank
April 16, 2010
Sound-Image Relational Analysis: The Shawshank
April 16, 2010
Narrative Analysis of The Shawshank Redemption
April 16, 2010
The story of The Shawshank Redemption tends to follow the classical narrative structure, which dominates most movies that are made in Hollywood. The movie is structured in the three part format typical of the classical structure, which organizes the story into the setup, the development, and the resolution.
Within the classical narrative structure, the setup of the film is where the main characters of the story are introduced, as well as their goals, and the obstacles their likely to face in the pursuit of their objectives. The beginning of The Shawshank Redemption introduces us to the main protagonist of the story, Andy Dufresne, as we quickly learn that he has just been accused and convicted of the death of his wife, and her lover. The character of Andy fit’s the stereotypical archetype of a protagonist, because the narrative plot evolves around him and we as an audience are made to feel the most empathy for him, having been wrongfully convicted. Although having been sentenced to two consecutive life sentences, Andy’s character appears to be good hearted, which is why we believe in his innocence. He has suffered great misfortune, however, his determination and faith is a central element in the play, shedding positive affects on both himself and the people within his circle. The notion of his innocence gives the story a developmental goal and establishes Andy’s characters objective, which is to prove his innocence and reclaim his freedom. This hook, as it is more commonly referred to, engages the attention of the audience and suggests the direction that the story is likely to take.
Having been sentenced to serve time at Shawshank State Penitentiary in Maine, this is where Andy meets the rest of the central and peripheral characters of the story. The prison is run by a Warden named Samuel Norton, the peripheral character in the story, in contradiction to Andy, Norton plays the role of the antagonist villain of the film, however, not without a bit of ambiguity. Upon first impression, the Warden has a rather authoritarian disposition, like you would expect from a person of his title, stringent in nature, however, he doesn’t come across as being a totally evil person as seen in his speech:
“This is Mr. Hadley, captain of the guard. I am Mr. Norton, the warden. You are sinners and scum, that’s why they sent you to me. Rule number one: no blaspheming. I’ll not have the Lord’s name taken in vain in my prison. The other rules you’ll figure out as you go along. Any questions?… I believe in two things. Discipline and the Bible. Here, you’ll receive both. Put your faith in the Lord. Your ass belongs to me. Welcome to Shawshank.”
So, while he does orchestrate the entire “Inside out” program, selling cheap prison labour for financial gain, a plot which Andy aids him in, he appears to be more or less a friend to Andy, even helping him improve the prison library in exchange for his services. It isn’t until Norton destroys Andy’s chance of proving himself innocent, by removing Tommy from Shawshank, for fear of losing his prized banker, that we as an audience see his true colours and his ambiguity revealed. This instance in the development of the play is typical of classical model structure of narrative storytelling, as it presents a false resolution to the story’s main conflict. So, Just as we thought Andy had a way to prove himself innocent and achieve his desired goal, the door is slammed shut, allowing us to come to the realization that if Andy has any success of achieving his objective, he must escape. Another character similar to Norton’s, is that of head prison guard, Byron Hadley, who although at times is depicted as being companionate and helping of Andy, is evidently the muscle of Norton and follows out the orders to shoot Tommy. In terms of plot structure, the Warden and Bryon Hadley are representative of Andy’s obstacles, standing in the way of the compelling protagonists objectives, preventing him from obtaining his freedom both physically and metaphysically. These obstacles are apart of the development of the story structure, contributing to the rising action and tension in the story, and setting us up for the dramatic climax. Furthermore, the two peripheral characters create a cause and effect relationship with the central characters, where there actions force reactions, all of which, further solidify this film as being of the classical narrative structure.
Other notable characters that are introduced to us within the confines of Shawshank and are central to the Narrative of the story, are Ellis Boyd Reading, nicknamed Red, and Brooks Hatlen. The more minimal of the two characters is Brooks, the veteran librarian of Shawshank, whose story is one that plays off the theme of hope within the movie. He is an inmate who due to his long incarceration, has been institutionalized, something that discourages the main characters from their own release, as depicted in Red’s statement:
“Man’s been here fifty years. This place is all he knows. In here, he’s an important man, an educated man. A librarian. Out there, he’s nothing but a used-up old con with arthritis in both hands. Couldn’t even get a library card if he applied. You see what I’m saying?”
Finally, after a long sentence, Brooks is released, only to find that society has dramatically changed and that he no longer has any quality of life or place within it. Discouraged and looking for an escape, he decides to take his own life, all of which is detailed in a letter he sends to Andy and his friends back in prison. In relation to the classical narrative structure of the film, Brooks story acts as a deterrent to hope, leaving the remaining inmates of Shawshank to fear the outside world and their own release. This serves to fuel the films increasing development of tension, as it presents yet another obstacle that the main characters hope must overcome.
The second of the two notable characters is that of Red’s, who in many senses is the second supporting protagonist in the story. Both Andy and Red become good friends with each other over the years, something that stems from Red’s reputation as “the guy who can get stuff.” The character of Red’s is vital to the narrative of the story, because he contrasts the character of Andy’s, as a man who has lost his faith and has no hope left for a life outside the penitentiary. In the end, it is Andy’s helping hand that pushes Red out from following the same path as Brooks did, when he was released, restoring his hope for a better life. Therefore, it is Red that is affected by Andy’s light and enthusiasm for hope, an instrumental shift in the story‘s development and resolution. In the end, both Red and Andy have reached their goal of obtaining freedom and a life outside of prison, fulfilling their objectives, as they both end up in Mexico reunited on the beach. This fulfillment of Andy’s and Red’s goals brings closure to the film, since all the major conflicts, issues, and ideas in the story have been resolved. Popular among the classical structure, is this ending of the protagonist conquering his obstacles and claiming his goal, leaving the story with the assertion that the protagonist will live happily ever after.
To summarize, the film the Shawshank redemption fit’s the structure of a classical narrative story, because it consists of having introduction, development, and resolution stages throughout it. To be specific, the film introduces us to the central characters of Andy, Red, and Brooks, as well as, the peripheral characters of Warden Norton and guard Hadley. Furthermore, we are presented with the central characters goals, which in this films case is the desire to be free. As the story progressed, the development stage of the story revealed the protagonists obstacles to us, which appeared as the Warden Norton and being institutionalization. The relationship between the protagonist and the obstacles created a cause and effect relationship, in which reactions followed actions. Finally, we came to a conclusion, following a dramatic climax, where the two main characters achieve their freedom and live happily ever after. All of this information points to the understanding that this story follows the guidelines of a classical narrative story structure.